From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Jan 9 07:30:08 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA09534 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 07:30:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA09529 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 07:30:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id HAA20160; Sat, 9 Jan 1999 07:30:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 07:30:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199901091530.HAA20160@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG From: Doug Rabson Subject: Re: kern/9359: implement support for adding syscalls in KLD modules Reply-To: Doug Rabson Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/9359; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Doug Rabson To: Assar Westerlund Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/9359: implement support for adding syscalls in KLD modules Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 15:21:33 +0000 (GMT) On 9 Jan 1999, Assar Westerlund wrote: > Doug Rabson writes: > > > Add adding support for `-p' in kldload with something that walkes the > > > list for the newly added kld_file_stat with `kldfirstmod' and > > > `modfnext' and calls a script with a list of the indexes and calling > > > the script with these? > > > > Sounds good - I'll tackle that at the same time. > > You mean I should wait instead of implementing it myself? :-) I started to write this and then couldn't really think of a use for it. The main one would be to make device nodes I guess but devfs is a far better solution IMHO. I'm going to close the PR now since the syscall stuff is in. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message