From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jun 1 14:25:38 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA05694 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 14:25:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emout07.mail.aol.com (emout07.mx.aol.com [198.81.11.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA05689 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 14:25:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Almondale@aol.com Received: (from root@localhost) by emout07.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id RAA19607 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 17:25:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 17:25:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <970601172501_877375401@emout07.mail.aol.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IP Masquerading Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The latest linux kernel includes support for IP Masquerading, so "private lans" can share a dialup gateway. What (if any) support does FreeBSD have for doing this. I have the most recent PPP binaries, but the routed command, when invoked with -q, returns "no route to hosts" or "can't assign requested address", and I get the effect described in the PPP manpages, namely the gateway host can see the internet via my ISP but *is not forwarding* packets back to my private LAN. I have invoked ppp with the -alias subcommand and given the static route to my ISDN-modem-equipped Freebsd (2.2.1) machine, but IP forwarding never seems to occur. I have even tried to remake the kernel using MROUTED, but it seems to me routed itself *ought* to work? Anybody with experience getting this setup to work? Thanks, Alex