Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:18:06 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run? Message-ID: <4F746F1E.6090702@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0D51AADCEDC563595301A38A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was wondering if there are some objections using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run. I figured out some problems with some rc.d scripts when using TMPFS for /var/run, samba and OpenLDAP do store some informations like PID in a subfolder of their own in /var/run, but the rc.d scripts are not checking properly the existence of the appropritae folder (unlike "dbus" and "hald", they check properly!). I already submitted two PRs, but for SAMBA, my "hack" is trivial and obviously to clumsy, so it should be check properly. My question is whether there are objections using TMPFS for bot /tmp/ and /var/run/ at this stage on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64? Regards, Oliver --------------enig0D51AADCEDC563595301A38A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPdG8kAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8h2oH/AlVcbr8LPzzluGc0OT0p1tl LXXPKrTwN1KmnyfEwMMa0V4UtaGQHlIlzmaesakuBvMrxVx4yaV9Zc2LA3Yld2cA eT0z0VcnOcAF3ghTCC9AWst0ANxt4FvW7jE2xvry3g8QEHLGxWm8yVHDWqTZ8DMp NXjfzyrDl+5T9kikOEWiQH2nxBrgKyIgVDUq5idoovlAcamOa8Agsafsgs9sLEnj sTVijd4dbHh8L9JSqzi/yYDDV20p0PT0F5QfzgQ4R1eixMBlOdjUtqS9TclYxlNB UtUS+sM2eKeNDP4EC85FvO6QF6mw+AGXkf+nE/uO9nHuAw/u6FKuPU0bhzmaRg8= =ER8a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0D51AADCEDC563595301A38A--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F746F1E.6090702>