From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 7 23:52:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E39C106564A for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from constantine.ticketswitch.com (constantine.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EEA8FC0C for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 23:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by constantine.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PFF2X-00024U-Og for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 23:52:49 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PFF2X-000AYx-N5 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 23:52:49 +0000 Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 23:52:49 +0000 Message-Id: To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Pete French Subject: Re: hast vs ggate+gmirror sychrnoisation speed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 23:52:51 -0000 Just to report back on this - I just tried the patches from last week, which fixed the sending of the keepalives in the different thread, but my original issue (the sychronisation speed) remains I'm afraid - so much for the theory that the corruption was causing the speed decrease. It's obviously good to have the threading issue fixed though. -pete.