From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 30 09:12:53 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id AD0C61065672; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:12:53 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:12:53 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20111130091253.GB4340@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201111292232.pATMWINp021704@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20111130015504.GB3953@FreeBSD.org>
	<20111130090313.00003930@unknown>
	<20111130080947.GA95193@FreeBSD.org> <4ED5F0CA.9010504@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4ED5F0CA.9010504@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	Pawe? P?kala <pawel@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-fonts Makefile
	ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
	pkg-plist ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro/files pkg-message.in
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:12:53 -0000

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:00:58AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> On 2011/11/30 09:09, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> No, thats just your incorrect interpretation. There is nothing 
> prohibiting capital letters in port names except the first character.

Technically, yes, but one should think carefully when it's OK and when it
would look more like Windoze or Mac OS X on what supposed to be Unix system.

> >Especially if "mixed" name looks just plain dumb and ugly.  We should not
> >uphold upstream's stupidity.
> 
> No no. We should mirror the upstream as closely as possible.

Please don't pass your personal opinions as project policies, thank you. :-)

Seriously, you really think that e.g. `audio/deadbeef' port (and plethora of
others) should be named `audio/deaDBeeF' (official name is DeaDBeeF)?

(In case of DeaDBeeF I do not consider this name stupid at all.  It just
does not fit as is into ports collection.)

./danfe