From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 22:28:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C5B16A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 22:28:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from resmo.com (resmo.com [204.202.11.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875A343D1D for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 22:28:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gstewart@bonivet.net) X-Resmo-Authenticated-User: [] X-Resmo-Msg-Submitted-By: mail.bonivet.net [81.56.185.133] Received: from dragonfly.bonivet.net (mail.bonivet.net [81.56.185.133]) by resmo.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j21MRwJB059658 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 22:27:59 GMT Received: from dragonfly.bonivet.net (localhost.bonivet.net [127.0.0.1]) by dragonfly.bonivet.net (8.13.3/8.13.1) with SMTP id j21MRp7O000702 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 23:27:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gstewart@bonivet.net) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 23:27:50 +0100 From: Godwin Stewart To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050301232750.3687c28a.gstewart@bonivet.net> In-Reply-To: <20050301202107.8F5525D07@ptavv.es.net> References: <20050301152458.6467caf3.gstewart@bonivet.net> <20050301202107.8F5525D07@ptavv.es.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.3 (GTK+ 2.4.14; i386-unknown-freebsd5.3) X-Face: #T;eJks=B[`71qrwp`l6BW8xI&hP8S*4Kd%e?8o"rL02ZYf"rWa41l83a)L,*; S).Ukq$U% II{-z#5%i&X8"%{$)ZWmE7WBDF)?wK1^7]u9T;@jqdZo?IT!d-L`!@&vW)F_1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Xorg 6.8.1 and SCHED_ULE vs. SCHED_4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:28:00 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:21:07 -0800, "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > Please DON'T top post to any FreeBSD list! Who was top-posting? I certainly wasn't! I hate that moronic practice with a vengeance. Only mildly less annoying is people writing to the list and Cc:'ing the message to multiple list members... > This is starting to sound like it might be an interrupt routing issue > and interrupts from the disk are sharing an IRQ with something > else. "Something else" is generating interrupts that are never getting > delivered, but the disk interrupts are waking the appropriate driver to > allow things to proceed. Whatever it was it would appear to be solved now anyway. - --=20 G. Stewart - gstewart@bonivet.net Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats. -- Howard Aiken -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCJOxmK5oiGLo9AcYRAv1kAJ0Ry39oiEczi8aOrkuBtK3yobt/LwCg21Rf bvbB4VIDXaC/3tfzJlNRaiM=3D =3DGUoN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----