From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mon Oct 24 17:57:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603C6C1F574 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@smeets.xyz) Received: from mail-out.smeets.xyz (mail-out.smeets.xyz [IPv6:2a01:4f8:160:918a::25:11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED297F64 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@smeets.xyz) Received: from mail.smeets.xyz (mail.smeets.xyz [IPv6:2a01:4f8:160:918a::25:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail-out.smeets.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCB92896D2; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:57:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amavis.smeets.xyz (amavis.smeets.xyz [IPv6:2a01:4f8:160:918a::aa:4]) by mail.smeets.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D569CC34; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:57:32 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mail.smeets.xyz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=smeets.xyz header.i=@smeets.xyz header.b=E+7WTile X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smeets.xyz Received: from mail.smeets.xyz ([IPv6:2a01:4f8:160:918a::25:3]) by amavis.smeets.xyz (amavis.smeets.xyz [IPv6:2a01:4f8:160:918a::aa:4]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id WQ-H7gTs2EQu; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:57:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nibbler-osx.fritz.box (unknown [IPv6:2001:4dd0:fd65:0:a4f7:8396:d518:22fb]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.smeets.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF5DF9CC0D; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:57:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=smeets.xyz; s=default; t=1477331847; bh=DkGL07Sf+9LsE0zkahSDSCQGXGuEP+V1VXbg6DNvULY=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=E+7WTileOmziQfYWxP4c8H8buJlgN1DwhcXNasUW2W0aKH4nfhZkukoEJTrsj240M tQImNzovpz73jP6672B5P/0/jcAJnv6FL6qQv04fwlb3AlKwwvEvo7bwFpxVPIsmHq jAogLtZ5vO85byshdTqFPtQ4HN1ymzADtEVuL3zI= Subject: Re: bsnmpd going crazy on 10-STABLE To: "Zane C. B-H." , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org References: <20161024120552.718c369d@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net> <20161024121555.4062c845@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net> From: Florian Smeets Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:57:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/50.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161024121555.4062c845@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OTQKOTMEdKetDOq4iD5UTD7otaLv5h4U7" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 17:57:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OTQKOTMEdKetDOq4iD5UTD7otaLv5h4U7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="dj1J5grUuTrWIaox77wWWJFni4uAtatKJ"; protected-headers="v1" From: Florian Smeets To: "Zane C. B-H." , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: bsnmpd going crazy on 10-STABLE References: <20161024120552.718c369d@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net> <20161024121555.4062c845@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net> In-Reply-To: <20161024121555.4062c845@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net> --dj1J5grUuTrWIaox77wWWJFni4uAtatKJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24/10/2016 19:15, Zane C. B-H. wrote: > On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:05:52 -0500 > "Zane C. B-H." wrote: >=20 >> >=20 > Commenting out the line below seems to have fixed it on the system in > question... >=20 > begemotSnmpdModulePath."hostres" =3D "/usr/lib/snmp_hostres.so" >=20 > Not sure why it is not behaving on only one 10-STABLE system. You need the patch from [1] unfortunately nobody committed it, yet. According the the PR it seems to be somewhat of a workaround. I have been running with it for 3 months now on stable/11. HTH, Florian [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209368 --dj1J5grUuTrWIaox77wWWJFni4uAtatKJ-- --OTQKOTMEdKetDOq4iD5UTD7otaLv5h4U7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYDkuEXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNzAxMDMyMDNCQ0FCNDRBOThGRUM4NDRF NzA1M0RGOUZGODZGMDc2AAoJEOcFPfn/hvB2QQMP/1QT9K9yHnBfRRAHV0XBfmot ZOPMfiA13aNQwC/PZ7OKFu95QkVV656OLac9gOPjmvyb6RvnW33DhfzKF+B59rnV YlWZcfQ7a1qK6J4fuH3ptofyx4g+Mh3Wg12S3kzWlEQpl/ASgxtajZ1rmrdkWHWb ZkMeM5sXb326WKKj7EVDSaWqFWhCBRzyZ+36bvLQbaYOkFL4SyJyPwJ30nMjvNFu zok0lc+MZ/Ty7RqVEzqzwpd1RnKyxtK6LINJQ0UAds2AiMVMYicCGXvQIFxWHgbJ m/Lup1fnfjsJjFEi3hC204QqF9xWakX0oWbDN3bFtuo/vWD1u4glpJoAEjxI+A8Y f590Y1JxscgWg5H1QdJmb0eOXpbjc3Wo9ndw0rYnHNLP5fbA3dkEFzpmY+KYiEmL Fg9azU712oG2PT+4qYJpQVpRgB9kZmHoymq6JEH6QPfZAWUp7qGzQ1DBmlueSuji ituXFwjtXy+vAohepnN2XMCHzt2cWrCuw4e/1eoq1+mvnSYU+aHRjID8YNkIKyaZ Ve7bl5qJTcq0jeLE0iAcjcJy7Yo0vMv3sHroqMyIw/cY5oY5EhHLoHb1tv/irEri PXjXGj4SqH6+AIVGvp10qhGYrlidegShl6X3E6CMrMjpW+CDsPxq2P8a3DbDXe09 /rdPXxy+2qCCGLtZujkd =cxoj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OTQKOTMEdKetDOq4iD5UTD7otaLv5h4U7--