From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 22 17:11:04 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B18F106566B
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:11:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com)
Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.213.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6998FC19
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:11:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so887502yxh.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:11:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject
	:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=flmoneGGVSEjMTJI+obFugdL3ZGZBxs7CJYIKqcmwE0=;
	b=cIr5YiZsVz9QiBtaEI91McipNYDWrm7UdlrovOmSngaF33K8jcytN9jGyogT+TlIuk
	w2mZ1lyc2T6rfzP04EkqFSW+htivdyresAo94B6dO4C6k+OeyJ+QC0ZsO9P3gdpyOBNU
	x/bK7lzfBx+H9E7Mn2gvpfCf8J1Mzr75/KOGQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc
	:content-type;
	b=hTLRA9gMlfKh/10/qJYIERhAZZUi1vNU6h7lsMntb7+3GcljXnNi9u260pQ3aZsZKA
	9SwzEql0XaHnS26vUyo4vvavCXcWVYcagF0GAXna78QN1mPgcVz6o7JMPPj/9eCczDTs
	m0izxfdsB8gEmz/eKt9nhdzTgk5wJQhZbhcpQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.199.19 with SMTP id w19mr2403357ybf.151.1295716262202;
	Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:11:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.105.197 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:11:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:11:02 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinkyUaR9+h0VQXrjVKm728Kr1rs7Xh05YzNDh=5@mail.gmail.com>
From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: More if_ath churn coming your way!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:11:04 -0000

Adrian Chadd wrote:
> 2011/1/22 Dima Panov <fluffy at fluffy.khv.ru>:
>
> > 22.01.2011, 22:19, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd at gmail.com>:

> This is why I really do need this tested as much as possible. I'll put
> up instructions on how to build if_ath as a module (that's what I'm
> doing on my RELENG_8 EEEPC - I'm running the HEAD if_ath on it for
> testing on the AR9280) and then sort out any and all issues on the
> AR5416, AR9160, AR9280 and AR9285.
>
> Throwing 11n into the mix right now is just a bit too much for me to take on. :)

Would you look to see if any of your improvements can also be used by uath(4)?

b.