Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:54:35 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation Message-ID: <201201031754.q03HsZKS046587@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:14:52 %2B0100." <20120103161452.3b10bb2f.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Polytropon wrote: > Maybe consider the chance that a FreeBSD OS can be > turned into closed source (which the license explicitely > allows) and put into some embedded device, a router, > a DSL modem, a managed switch... In parts like this, > you won't recognize FreeBSD anymore. If you consider > such devices "niche devices", think again: You'll > find them near any Internet-connected computer and > among the bowels of the whole Internet. :-) Yes, BSD gets embedded & not recognised. Some business notebook users years back who thought they were just running security enhanced MS_Win on their notebooks would have not understood their notebooks actually booted FreeBSD first, for `security stuff', then ran MS on top. http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=utimaco+safeguard+freebsd&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1 Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201201031754.q03HsZKS046587>