From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Mon Jul 13 09:13:43 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DD33B59
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:13:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 339F91ABD;
 Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:13:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com)
Received: by qkdv3 with SMTP id v3so54573850qkd.3;
 Mon, 13 Jul 2015 02:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=7IEA//zyfbMMipD9/BtZaDoyiZ8uJYRcURf4936jFQ4=;
 b=IoSDeGTWRkt/uoMuOtbQHAtn2T9UKpG5DPVQ45b8qu4uY+jRFRyBLv1YPV9szQ4Gb4
 bC1McEVce/HlIROBB+iSh8HFQ7cunt8UUaS1RUwMzZaImWyFp/dRMyMHbg01LStuCc5Q
 B6lrpGlMhz0uXFGWXJ5tNdr1cGUzupvCA5rQvAee5G4Jfk6JEOcpqdTQWzAVUKrix7yl
 iTD7lBQl43MwH9TJ0jxoqi7WQP4AAZzJFakbA1Mne350+BrUr/Q8eArr2LsmvK9Aw0bV
 zH7mduzoiDMZUzvjXyx0e2hI9AdaTtVXEn5uUUuBpMoJWwYvANWNbjevYbO/+qOk7hKQ
 Ej7Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.151.203 with SMTP id 194mr30567742qhx.80.1436778822257; 
 Mon, 13 Jul 2015 02:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.98.73 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 02:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55A33A8A.6070505@freebsd.org>
References: <20140415233133.GA14686@ambrisko.com> <5452600C.5030003@omnilan.de>
 <20141101154004.GA40398@ambrisko.com> <559FD426.3000108@omnilan.de>
 <20150710154654.GA71708@ambrisko.com>
 <55A33A8A.6070505@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 02:13:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGHfRMCe3e8EFG9Xr8HxkpDX7dLxX_0FyRhLC7K91EDHg77mcg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fix MNAMELEN or reimplement struct statfs
From: NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
Cc: freebsd <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:13:43 -0000

On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> this hits us occasionally too
>  Kirk, you are mentioned here as having a finger in this pie.
>
> do we have a suggested way forward?

Alternatively, is the ino64_t work slated for CURRENT anytime soon (if
it was before 11.0-RELEASE that would be best probably...).
Thanks!