From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Nov 30 15:48:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-178-34.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.178.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB09737B400 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eAUNuWF01014; Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:56:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200011302356.eAUNuWF01014@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Brian Behlendorf Cc: Peter Lai , "'Gunnar Flygt '" , "'FreeBSD Stable '" Subject: Re: Can this really be true? FreeBSD not working on IBM T20's In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2000 11:57:30 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 15:56:32 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Peter Lai wrote: > > So use ext2 or some other FS for your freebsd slices! > > Has anyone actually validated this as a solution? Installation using this as a technique would be very difficult. You'd also need a -current loader with ext2 support. I do not consider it a solution. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message