From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 30 23:45:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA05647 for current-outgoing; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 23:45:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA05640 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 1998 23:45:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA04364; Sat, 31 Jan 1998 08:41:08 +0100 (CET) To: Garrett Wollman cc: Terry Lambert , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LFS is nuked? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 30 Jan 1998 20:08:32 EST." <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 08:41:08 +0100 Message-ID: <4362.886232468@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe current" In message <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollman write s: ><com> said: > >> Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's >> bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and >> X.25 code have all been fixed... > >But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to >real users. ... But appearantly not enough added value to make anybody actually make it work. QED: The attic is the right place. And yes, personally I belive that portals & unionfs could go the same way... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!"