From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 16:33:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 512D220B for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 16:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com (mail-qg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 021F9767 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 16:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id j5so21205401qga.3 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 08:33:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yTJma6lsoQqRj+NKvTkKpwkFpexltjljBQ5BJJZHmww=; b=X+W8yYPgYUezRy0l6aL9goWLCYDCN66c60dTHxOsNhIFhfweaH6LMTQOOsEKQCszG0 f6/CKLhBE2WDIYDuqOm/apjp30szJ+y3Y7mnoEK1nNeLQCNl+PJKYisgiNKksknvz2sm du/j4iYoTIh5Yu9YqaZo6PbJ+MsQijnZq8pXh4m5qL7wzwztL4y03YBCBvcjEv1NyZSN IEx4yt75ebafVxwzZsX3fcoHAoZ07LoTnq9i0A+piumojpUDuPoKdfSEWN5WTFVX2A3g kfTP0f2MUj96i/yiTHIvG8Og7klq7rb94E5SObIXrwW5uZUHEeuNpJHJxdUr3CZVA5G2 8h7g== X-Received: by 10.140.93.139 with SMTP id d11mr15276915qge.101.1424622805109; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 08:33:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([209.181.150.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 131sm15808124qhh.48.2015.02.22.08.33.22 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 22 Feb 2015 08:33:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54EA04D2.6090208@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 09:33:22 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why would I get a segmentation fault on one system but not the other? References: <20150221224006.GA5501@home.parts-unknown.org> <09da5ec0816e098badc49432c802dc18@sdf.org> <390c4c0547fc27e91d28872d29aa2e04@sdf.org> <20150222091956.fd1ec914.freebsd@edvax.de> <20150222104425.GA44573@home.parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: <20150222104425.GA44573@home.parts-unknown.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 16:33:26 -0000 On 02/22/2015 03:44 AM, David Benfell wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 09:19:56AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:03:50 -0600, cpet wrote: >>> As well as don't use stable on a production box as STABLE doesn't mean >>> what it means. >> STABLE means that the API/ABI is stable. Unlike HEAD (CURRENT), >> STABLE still is actually _stable_ in most cases, so it's a valid >> solution for production systems (given that you're prepared well, >> and you know what you're doing). I'm running STABLE on few >> production machines myself (where this is needed), but I usually >> prefer (and often recommend) using RELEASE and add the security >> patches when they are available. >> > Thinking about this more, I'm inclined to think my problem is not with > the base system. I haven't seen *any* crashes with stuff that can be > clearly identified as being in the base system, let alone the kernel. > > My memory test has just completed a 4th pass with zero errors. It's > now been running for 7.5 hours. > > I think my problem is somewhere in the ports. > A crazy possibility - but thought I would mention it. Is it possible you are having overheating problems, fans not running well?...