From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 26 07:30:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF57106564A; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:30:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650C18FC0A; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:30:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n6Q7Uw5E044241 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:30:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n6Q7Uvs7044240; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA11549; Sun, 26 Jul 09 00:28:36 PDT Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:25:41 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: bsam@ipt.ru Message-Id: <4a6c04f5.kCRwnNHuKXMD2Eoc%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4A6B6A25.2040508@videotron.ca> <6201873e0907251532u5a100c2du15c910d51522bc26@mail.gmail.com> <4A6B8F5A.7050203@videotron.ca> <46921322@ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <46921322@ipt.ru> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: af.gourmet@videotron.ca, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: >1 linux_base port (Re: 7.2 amd64 Flash) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:30:59 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > PJ writes: > > I already had f8 installed as well as fc-4 > That's wrong. Two linux_base ports should not be installed > at a system ... Might it be advisable for each new linux_base port to declare itself incompatible with all earlier ones, to prevent this kind of error? (Cc: ports@)