Date: Wed, 10 Jul 1996 08:25:21 -0400 (EDT) From: James FitzGibbon <james@nexis.net> To: Dave Babler <dbabler@Rigel.orionsys.com> Cc: Don Yuniskis <dgy@rtd.com>, James FitzGibbon <james@nexis.net>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port of Majordomo v1.93 Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.960710082429.23140B-100000@bdd.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960709180814.16322A-100000@Rigel.orionsys.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 Jul 1996, Dave Babler wrote: > > Why did you opt for UID/GID of 67 (vs. the 54 suggested)... just curious. > > > I haven't looked at the port, but after much hair pulling my majordomo > installation was made with the majordomo "user" / POSIX model, which > requires the UDI/GID of whatever the created majordom account has... is > this not the 'right' way for FBDS? (The Makefile reference was to BSDI > being of that flavor, no direct reference to FBSD, of course). I think Don was just referring to the default Makefile using 54, whereas I chose 67. A personal thing. -- j. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | James FitzGibbon james@nexis.net | | Integrator, The Nexis Group Voice/Fax : 416 410-0100 | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.94.960710082429.23140B-100000>