From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 10 23:21:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B00106566B for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:21:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B3E8FC13 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 23:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxl31 with SMTP id 31so2910492yxl.13 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:21:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.193.100 with SMTP id j64mr10551863yhn.294.1305069703961; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:21:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (twdp-174-109-142-001.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.142.1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u50sm3394497yhn.50.2011.05.10.16.21.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 May 2011 16:21:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3QTc6C6zYjz2CG5G for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:21:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:21:38 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20110510192138.2949728d@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <20110510173153.638712fb@mr12941> <20110510210007.3a441404@ukr.net> <201105101821.40059.lobo@bsd.com.br> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: (8.2) amd64 + linuxulator + nvidia driver is it stable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 23:21:45 -0000 On Tue, 10 May 2011 17:30:04 -0400 Pierre-Luc Drouin articulated: > I am using the non-devel version of nspluginwrapper. On my system, > flash causes firefox to hang for maybe 10-20 seconds sometimes, but > this resolves by itself... I think the problem that was originally > identified and that I am also experiencing is not necessarily the > same as what you are describing, although it is nice to know that the > hanging problems might be gone with nspluginwrapper-devel. Usually > when I kill npviewer.bin though, it is to prevent it from generating > CPU load... I don't think that a day goes by that I don't have to kill a dozen npviewer.bin instances and delete one or two 300M+ npviewer.bin.core files. A real PIA to say the least. -- Jerry ✌ jerry+fbsd@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies, ignored or reported as Spam. Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________