From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 5 20:10:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id C399A16A469; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701C116A417; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jb@what-creek.com) Received: from what-creek.com (what-creek.com [66.111.37.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FB713C4E1; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jb@what-creek.com) Received: by what-creek.com (Postfix, from userid 102) id BFA7F732AD; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:10:01 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:10:01 +0000 From: John Birrell To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20080205201001.GB24780@what-creek.com> References: <200802050929.m159Tc2s024644@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080205182026.D49855@fledge.watson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080205182026.D49855@fledge.watson.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: John Birrell , Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 134831 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:10:03 -0000 On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:21:10PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, John Birrell wrote: > > >http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=134831 > > > >Change 134831 by jb@jb_freebsd1 on 2008/02/05 09:29:08 > > > > We define FOPEN_MAX as 20. What a joke. > > I thought the comment was entertaining, apparently I'd never noticed that > before: > > /* > * FOPEN_MAX is a minimum maximum, and is the number of streams that > * stdio can provide without attempting to allocate further resources > * (which could fail). Do not use this for anything. > */ > > Some piece of code clearly loses on this front..? Yes, our awk. When I add another temporary file to sys/kern/makesyscalls.sh, awk can't handle it. "one-true-awk .... except when you need to use gawk." hehe -- John Birrell