From nobody Mon Sep 9 22:49:01 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X2hpn2zbCz5VL6l for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 22:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw1-x1130.google.com (mail-yw1-x1130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X2hpl5VKCz4CYT for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 22:49:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=IcfyVK+T; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::1130 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com Received: by mail-yw1-x1130.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6b47ff8a59aso47487027b3.2 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 15:49:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725922159; x=1726526959; darn=freebsd.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=H+NeYH8VH4hE9dBmVphVIkyAEvicKPQ4JhGPX7Asc6A=; b=IcfyVK+TSP7RXR37YkFz3QQdPWp8Dk86bSHxpNyV8F5jWKmGuPYs+F+9R6bYKfwo3n 8st2zRFOe29Rq3xfAavVjA73d310lP+N9U0YMnaeiTORsblMg2WKWSHae3K2MgzkMyyA L+sJNWD66ouSbQQMQkslecBnQfKuaacSCNEfCKJXDzGKz7B3ShsNXiVDvlpBs8Vpc7p8 xSQcg1QgKHY6RJZ9KN6GYIcRgim8RC4kx1xPUu/sMlQ7n8F6kAFX4+0Bc8ERTT0USX2j 5jNWR2pVkETV+2dJ1QbGWeJqWbw2GAHYlLpoABUIismTBO0/qd8bqmdxihuKStuRCtCt QtJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725922159; x=1726526959; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=H+NeYH8VH4hE9dBmVphVIkyAEvicKPQ4JhGPX7Asc6A=; b=Z8nlKUNdBU3X3TQUnYLorsUqcQWKusgBYvvTrD6Rk6VC1j+MCxzhMRW+kkDkJoZh+R wQlfxKx7PhLNqrebLI9YGfDYDaeQIIyVSUPvJcX3AdzsfXkh71F7lLRFIgmzkQpHqF6e iZrU6bC7QDu+ZyGKuCfieiSrBTYzAuDq4gUZESNp/R5M784Rq2TdfGZkMhDA/usHiXpo Ub/A8PeWsw6ERqb7OhhqrQ0AHcmMzO89rYJrsNhpOw4BGZxLmDXEz+4AbIafiMw4xPq+ nful3jSKb4J/lK8y1QSnk0mwiK1D6t/3pFV6V3iZtoMO5x9OB4IAs6y13o067MFnKwj3 uUeQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX80Kgh2sBqX+kwjodX3VG3UmjpUwqgtbyhxhoT7MTHDKThwTsU/lDgMWbpEdZxSz/PBQE9Z8SB5p+ofy5ZEp4bcw==@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz8ZliDCqzK33WFvzmgj+wnAhqC2vmLCltE9gLstSZ25wtDn1LG cJEvkOQ1yzomsOG/g1tBdR5kaeCjTpWogOzIhT8SRcqv2L3ISGq2+LDCK23ATyCBtcsIMmHMg9t dWkSQRsWBd/fc0f2diR6sXfyC+uw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE3d9CK022OXdO86N1N+6RP+NM0YlTkHc5RRmp7p5j1XRgmV/uCBGorVb0BTfVh60PI06VwoblB063ZFCu4tcg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:83:b0:632:5b24:c0c with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6db44d6cd0emr153678367b3.5.1725922158730; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 15:49:18 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Kevin Oberman Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 15:49:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Listing packages built for a random release/architecture To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= Cc: Tomek CEDRO , User Questions Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002e666d0621b791d3" X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.60 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.902]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20230601]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2607:f8b0:4864:20::1130:from]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROMTLD(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4X2hpl5VKCz4CYT --0000000000002e666d0621b791d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 2:10=E2=80=AFPM Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa < fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 8:58=E2=80=AFPM Kevin Oberman wrote: > >> >> For amd64 V14.?, you can go to >> https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy22/jail.html?mastername=3D140amd64-d= efaultThis >> is a list of all builds for 14. (Packages are always built for the oldes= t >> supported minor release of each major version. Minor updates must not br= eak >> the system ABI, so 14.0 builds should work for all V14 systems. The >> exception is kernel modules which get messy, but not binutils. >> >> Unfortunately, builds on hte new Chicago build systems are no linger >> ordered by time, but by hash. The last build is highlighted yellow, but = it >> will likely not include all packages, so you have to find the last few >> builds and walk back over them to find binutils. Fortunately, binutils >> was updated in the latest build completed yesterday. For cases where you >> need ot go back, here is a list of the most recent builds for 140amd64: >> f550157a18a4 >> 46b3743b8460 >> 50625859d806 35743 >> 60a177caf143 5734 >> ff9b1b7bdb15 750 >> ac90984a4ba1 1649 >> 1963f6d23107 9924 >> 3efa6621722c 14528 >> b3cf46924d98 10287 >> a760f6876277 1307 >> 935c61ac4bff 3346 >> 15d22e1c70da 9178 >> 1b6eada811a7 3353 >> 59e63aec278e 11646 >> 94b089c7ad30 5477 >> b9994ae18767 35841 >> 13f486017d78 19763 >> >> Newest at the bottom. the second column is the number of packages built >> in the build. >> >> I really hope that this is improved! >> > > Thanks! > This is what I was looking for. > > Now, how do you exactly go from https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ to > https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy22/jail.html?mastername=3D140amd64-de= fault > ?? > Because in the main page, if I filter in "Package Builds" using the text > box at the right, and type "140", I get 15 entries, and none of them has > the 13f486017d78 > > hash for the build. > In addition if I click on > > 59d8804dcdd7 > > and try to go to the poudriere build, my system can not reach > http://gohan02.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=3D14stable-amd64-qua= rterly-baseline&build=3D59d8804dcdd7 > > Cheers. > Since the new builders are in Chicago, it's not surprising gohan02.nyi.freebsd.org does not get you there. ATM, this is a bit of a mess. I hope it will be fixed, the pkg-status does not yet talk to the new Chicago systems, so the last build in New York will be the last that shows up directly on pkg-status. As far as I can tell, only 140amd64 is no a new builder. I do see one build of 140i386-default on beefy21. Looks like 14amd64-monthly might be headed for beefy20, but it doesn't seem to be loading now, so it might not be production, yet. Wish I could be more helpful, but I just poke around and see what I can find. --=20 Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 --0000000000002e666d0621b791d3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 = at 2:10=E2=80=AFPM Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> wrote:


On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 8:58=E2=80=AFPM Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com<= /a>> wrote:
<= div dir=3D"ltr">

For amd64 V14.?, you can go to https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/beefy22/jail.html= ?mastername=3D140amd64-defaultThis is a list of all builds for 14. (Pac= kages are always built for the oldest supported minor release of each major= version. Minor updates must not break the system ABI, so 14.0 builds shoul= d work for all V14 systems. The exception is kernel modules which get messy= , but not binutils.

Unfortunately, builds on hte new Chicago build systems are no linger= ordered by time, but by hash. The last build is highlighted yellow, but it= will likely not include all packages, so you have to find the last few bui= lds and walk back over them to find binutils. Fortunately, binutils
was updated= in the latest build completed yesterday. For cases where you need ot go ba= ck, here is a list of the most recent builds for 140amd64:
f550157a18a4
46b3743b= 8460
50625859d806 35743
60a177caf143 5734
ff9b1b7bdb15 750
ac90= 984a4ba1 1649
1963f6d23107 9924
3efa6621722c 14528
b3cf46924d98 10= 287
a760f6876277 1307
935c61ac4bff 3346
15d22e1c70da 9178
1b6ea= da811a7 3353
59e63aec278e 11646
94b089c7ad30 5477
b9994ae18767 358= 41
13f486017d78 19763

Newest at the bottom. the second column is the number of packag= es built in the build.

I really hope that this is improved!
=

Thanks!
This is what I was looking for.
=

Because in the = main page, if I filter in "Package Builds" using the text box at = the right, and type "140", I get 15 entries, and none of them has= the 13f486017d78 hash for the build.
In addition if I click on 59d8804dcdd7 and try to go to the p= oudriere build, my system can not reach http://gohan02.nyi.freebsd.org/build.htm= l?mastername=3D14stable-amd64-quarterly-baseline&build=3D59d8804dcdd7

Since the new builders are in Chicago, it's not sur= prising gohan02.nyi.freebsd.org does not get you there. ATM, this is a bit of= a mess. I hope it will be fixed, the pkg-status does not yet talk to the n= ew Chicago systems, so the last build in New York will be the last that sho= ws up directly on pkg-status. As far as I can tell, only 140amd64 is no a n= ew builder. I do see one build of 140i386-default on beefy21.=C2=A0 Looks l= ike 14amd64-monthly might be headed for beefy20, but=C2=A0 it doesn't s= eem to be loading now, so it might not be production, yet.
=
Wish I could be more helpful, but I just poke around an= d see what I can find.
--
Kevin Ob= erman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
--0000000000002e666d0621b791d3--