From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 13 20:48:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCD016A41F; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:48:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kbyanc@posi.net) Received: from ylpvm12.prodigy.net (ylpvm12-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D083743D1F; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:48:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kbyanc@posi.net) Received: from pimout6-ext.prodigy.net (pimout6-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.22]) by ylpvm12.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5DKmsG2011687; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:48:54 -0400 X-ORBL: [68.120.137.28] Received: from gateway.posi.net (adsl-68-120-137-28.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [68.120.137.28]) by pimout6-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.10 milter /8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5DKmshe491640; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:48:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gateway.posi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C6C75E05F; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:52:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:52:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Kelly Yancey To: Garance A Drosihn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050613145157.Q43977@gateway.posi.net> References: <200504132122.j3DLMKHa089226@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Poul-Henning Kamp , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools/nanobsd ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:48:56 -0000 On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Back on April 13/2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > Modified files: > > tools/tools/nanobsd make.conf > > Log: > > sort and expand the prunelist in a more or less generally sensibly > > order. Put some strategic comments in about how much storage is > > necessary and a longer explanation on the top. > > > > It is now pretty trivial to put nanoBSD on as little as a 64MB > > CF card. > > Are any macros defined (-D) in CFLAGS when building for nanoBSD, > or other "please make a smaller system" situations? ISTR some > value to check via #ifdef, but now I can't remember what it was > or where I saw it used. > At least camcontrol conditionalizes functionality based on the definition of MINIMALISTIC. Kelly -- Kelly Yancey - kbyanc@{posi.net,FreeBSD.org} - kelly@nttmcl.com