Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 23:36:17 +0300 From: Stefan Parvu <sparvu@systemdatarecorder.org> To: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: There is currently no usable release of FreeBSD. Message-ID: <20140604233617.a97ffe3b3e04c6d8bbb2b4db@systemdatarecorder.org> In-Reply-To: <538F7F10.7070605@freebsd.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406040944570.2120@kozubik.com> <332D72DF-2225-40E2-B246-0786181AAB51@tony.li> <538F5FB5.9060008@FreeBSD.org> <20140604231432.a5581f5a50f8d7e1611f9736@systemdatarecorder.org> <538F7F10.7070605@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Technically, the branches are stable fair enough, but remember some people don't know what are FreeBSD branches nor the internal notation or the calling convention. They want to know what can they download to use on their production environments. As well, probable makes sense to have somewhere defined why there are 3 stable, production releases and the life support scheme for each. Sort of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_%28operating_system%29 (Solaris Release Timeline) > so it'd be: > Releases: 10.0, 9.2, 8.4 > Testing: 11-snapshot, 9.3 Sounds good. I think legacy should be dropped in favour of something simpler and easy to digest from sys admins to data center managers. -- Stefan Parvu <sparvu@systemdatarecorder.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140604233617.a97ffe3b3e04c6d8bbb2b4db>