From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct  1 09:21:20 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888AE1065689;
	Wed,  1 Oct 2008 09:21:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
	[IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC1A8FC2C;
	Wed,  1 Oct 2008 09:21:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m919LExs008289;
	Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id
	m919LESn008286; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <48E33CC6.7050504@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20081001111911.U8258@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <1222681181.48e0a25d094c3@www.inbox.lv>
	<BAY139-DAV13C8982A51CD9B05C74D5090430@phx.gbl>
	<48E21C66.8080407@FreeBSD.org>
	<BAY139-DAV5423DFBF403B32AA0C22690430@phx.gbl>
	<20080930161407.E16761@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<BAY139-DAV45B9F2CCF6913F5533E3090430@phx.gbl>
	<20080930205435.B20033@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<00ee01c92346$69508fa0$3bf1aee0$@com>
	<20080930224447.GA58065@icarus.home.lan>
	<20081001083637.C7317@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<48E33CC6.7050504@infracaninophile.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>, Danny Do <ai_quoc@hotmail.com>,
	freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Optimal File System config for 2.5TB RAID5
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:21:20 -0000

> | | the simple answer is that software RAID on todays computers vastly | 
> outperforms ANY hardware raid solution, maybe except the ones for 10000$ | or 
> more.
>
> You're basically correct, but I think you're overestimating the price of
> a good RAID controller.

no. please give me example of any RAID hardware below 10000$ that WILL be 
faster than properly configure software RAID solution under FreeBSD with 
same amount of same disks.

i mean faster under normal unix-like load, which is lots of parallel 
accesses to same or different things, not simple tests.


there are NONE.