From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 9 11:39:22 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA27162 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 11:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA27157 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 11:39:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA24711; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 11:33:02 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199607091833.LAA24711@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Samba FS planned to implement? To: igor@cs.ibank.ru (Igor Vinokurov) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 11:33:02 -0700 (MST) Cc: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199607090957.NAA28123@escape.cs.ibank.ru> from "Igor Vinokurov" at Jul 9, 96 01:57:30 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > re, > > smbclient - cool but interactive. :) I have a proposal on the table (in a news group posting) for session management and a password cache interface. These are prerequisites for a correct implementation. The Linux implementation is incorrect, and opens security holes you could drive a truck through. This would not be so bad if the default configuration was not so badly thought out that you could drive three trucks and a blimp through. Remember the CERT advisort for Microsoft SMB servers? Imagine it applying to all of your UNIX systems. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.