From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 14 10:46:50 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31B416A405
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 10:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from hans@lambermont.dyndns.org)
Received: from lambermont.dyndns.org (lambermont.dyndns.org [82.93.47.245])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AE843D5F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 10:46:48 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from hans@lambermont.dyndns.org)
Received: by lambermont.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 5E45814DAB6; Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:46:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:46:47 +0200
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20060414104647.GA69951@leia.lambermont.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
From: hans@lambermont.dyndns.org (Hans Lambermont)
Subject: Duplicate entries in +REQUIRED_BY files
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 10:46:50 -0000

Is it normal for +REQUIRED_BY files to have double entries in it ?

f.i. in /var/db/pkg> cat png-1.2.8_3/+REQUIRED_BY
ImageMagick-6.2.5.5_2
arts-1.5.1_1,1
boinc-client-4.68.20050601_3
boinc-setiathome-4.07.20050601_3
cairo-1.0.2_2
cairo-1.0.2_2
cups-base-1.1.23.0_8
cups-base-1.1.23.0_8
...

I noticed these while using portmaster version 1.1

regards,
  Hans Lambermont