From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 26 10:23:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D0B16A4BF for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 10:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C8B343FBD for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 10:23:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 57623 invoked from network); 26 Oct 2003 18:23:34 -0000 Received: from niwun.pair.com (HELO localhost) (209.68.2.70) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Oct 2003 18:23:34 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 12:23:32 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: vivek@CS.Princeton.EDU In-Reply-To: <1067183332.3f9bece4c0cf4@webmail.cs.princeton.edu> Message-ID: <20031026121527.K2023@odysseus.silby.com> References: <1066789354.21430.39.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <1066816287.25609.34.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <1066820436.25609.93.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> <1067183332.3f9bece4c0cf4@webmail.cs.princeton.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?b?U234cmdyYXY=?= cc: Kris Kennaway cc: Q cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some mmap observations compared to Linux 2.6/OpenBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 18:23:37 -0000 On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 vivek@CS.Princeton.EDU wrote: > Details about what we have so far are at > http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~yruan/debox/ > > Yaoping Ruan had mentioned this on the list before (and sent a > pointer to the sendfile patches), but didn't seem to get much > response. > > -Vivek As always, you're seeing the lack of available committer time, not a real lack of interest. One way to accelerate the process might be for someone (not necessarily you, any reader of this mailing list could do it) to show that this change visibly benefits some easy to run benchmark. Some simple setup of apachebench vs thttpd (which uses sendfile, afaik) would be useful for this purpose. Mike "Silby" Silbersack