From owner-freebsd-isp  Thu Jun 24 11:17: 0 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from bogon.kjsl.com (bogon.kjsl.com [205.179.23.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68F414D07
	for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from javier@bogon.kjsl.com)
Received: (from javier@localhost)
	by bogon.kjsl.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA07632;
	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Javier Henderson <javier@KJSL.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14194.30171.864116.451193@bogon.kjsl.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 11:15:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>
Cc: Leif Neland <leifn@neland.dk>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: why not uucp, instead of smtp and static ip?
In-Reply-To: <19990624195332.F1893@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
References: <00c901bebe64$f5267d60$0e00a8c0@neland.dk>
	<19990624195332.F1893@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.63 under Emacs 19.34.1
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai writes:

 > In fact how many people even remember QWK and Blue Wave?

	Anyone still running makepaths...?

 > Afaik there are no reasons not to use UUCP... I would gladly learn why
 > people would not advise it.

	I've a few UUCP peers, actually. They all use UUCP/TCP, and it
works great.

-jav


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message