From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 6 21:36:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57C3106566B; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:36:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD048FC17; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:36:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7DC19E023; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:36:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D76C419E019; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:36:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B6DE0D6.30502@quip.cz> Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:36:22 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 SeaMonkey/2.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu References: <1781265383542@webmail54.yandex.ru> <20100206004206.5b87b5ee@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <01qv37-4ho2.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4B6D3D80.5000400@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4B6DCBA2.5030202@quip.cz> <20100206224504.697dc717@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20100206224504.697dc717@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent massive port update. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:36:27 -0000 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:05:54 +0100 > Miroslav Lachman<000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > >> Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 06/02/2010 09:40, Heino Tiedemann wrote: >>> >>>> Shouldn't there be an entry in UPDATING, that "jpeg" has to be >>>> rebuildet first? >>>> >>>> I rebuilded everything - but i have no idea about the order aof >>>> port reinstalling. >>> >>> Actually that's not necessary in this case entirely because the >>> commit was so large. Every port that needs to be rebuilt because >>> it depends on libjpeg has had it's PORTREVISION bumped. That means >>> that if you just do a 'portupgrade -a' or 'portmaster -a' the right >>> thing will happen automatically. >> >> >> No metter if there is revision bump or not, it should be in UPDATING >> as it was in case of jpeg-7. >> >> 20090719: >> AFFECTS: users of graphics/jpeg >> AUTHOR: dinoex@FreeBSD.org >> >> The IJG jpeg library has been updated to version 7.0. Please >> rebuild all ports that depend on it. > > No need, since it a port has a new version, a rebuild is expected. Is expected, but if somebody are not using portmaster or portupgrade, simple upgrade of jpeg will break other ports and I think that in the case of jpeg (widely used library) there will be a lot of users asking "why my app XYZ is not working anymore". So what was the reason to put UPDATING entry 20090719 for jpeg 7, if it is no longer needed for jpeg 8? Miroslav Lachman