From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 20 19:14:14 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA04847 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 19:14:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from gorplex.j51.com (gorplex.j51.com [199.224.7.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA04841 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 19:14:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from drew@localhost) by gorplex.j51.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id WAA00852; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 22:14:18 -0500 From: Drew Morone Message-Id: <199512210314.WAA00852@gorplex.j51.com> Subject: Re: Weird workaround that works To: shovey@buffnet.net (Stephen Hovey) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 22:14:17 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Stephen Hovey" at Dec 20, 95 12:14:36 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8b] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I had the same problem. I set the the speed down to 2400 and things fly. Under that it screws with certain applications (like vi). BTW, since my portmaster ports are set to 115200, they passed that same speed to the rlogin host. Can you imagine how it felt at 115200!? Drew > > > > Per previous notes, under 2.1R rlogin crawls with screen draws. > > Ive been bashing my head against it all day - then finally I noted that > stty on a telnet shows 9600 baud and on rloing it shows 57600. > > Since this is a network connections I figured 'what the heck' and I did > an stty speed 9600 while in with rlogin. > > My screen draws speeded back up dramatically. > > I note that 2.0.5R showed 57600 with rlogin too, but was not adversly > affected. > > So now it feels/seems like a flow control issue, or a pty issue or > something. I have my functional work around (setting stty speed 9600) > but it isnt a perfect one. > > If any knows enough about this to offer any ideas on what might be amiss > or what I can more gracefully do to solve my chopping screen draws I > would appreciated a note on it! >