From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 8 22:27:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231B716A41C for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 22:27:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [212.27.205.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509D543D49 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 22:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (localhost.oook.cz [127.0.0.1]) by hood.oook.cz (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j68MRL7S085026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 9 Jul 2005 00:27:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by hood.oook.cz (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j68MRKEk085025; Sat, 9 Jul 2005 00:27:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: hood.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Gerald Pfeifer In-Reply-To: References: <1120859884.91809.13.camel@hood.oook.cz> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qaBXMmbxHan5RsAxuGpm" Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 00:27:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1120861640.91809.15.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: lang/gcc33: snapshots -> final release X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:27:23 -0000 --=-qaBXMmbxHan5RsAxuGpm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gerald Pfeifer p=ED=B9e v so 09. 07. 2005 v 00:04 +0200: > On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > This looks like decreating PKGVERSION to me, because 3.3.6.20050511 is > > more than 3.3.6. You will have to add PORTEPOCH=3D1 or something. >=20 > This is why I wrote the following above my patch in my original message.=20 > ;-) >=20 > >> I've got a proto-patch which looks as follows, but simply removing=20 > >> PORTREVISION is bad in terms of version comparisons as far as I can > >> see. > >>=20 > >> Would changing the revision from "20050511" to "release" work? >=20 > Would that work? No, because $ pkg_version -t 3.3.6.20050511 3.3.6.release > --=20 Pav Lucistnik It's time for the penguin on top of your television set to explode. --=-qaBXMmbxHan5RsAxuGpm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCzv3IntdYP8FOsoIRApBlAJ0cGb8WnvjTqA6/DYIh0WdUxjBqWgCeO0l+ ZtE0XN3WghY+RBmj3lQOGAY= =9XCx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qaBXMmbxHan5RsAxuGpm--