From owner-cvs-all Tue Nov 2 20:59:21 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles558.castles.com [208.214.165.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF1514E61; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 20:59:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA02148; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 20:50:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199911030450.UAA02148@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Archie Cobbs Cc: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa spkr.c src/sys/kern subr_scanf.c src/sys/pc98/pc98 spkr.c src/sys/sys systm.h In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 Nov 1999 18:22:03 PST." <199911030222.SAA75822@bubba.whistle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 20:50:21 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I wasn't clear about doing that way though.. e.g., why was strtoul() > put inside kern/subr_scanf.c instead of libkern? I was following that > example. > > Maybe strtoul() should be moved to a new file libkern/strtoul.c.. Quite probably. I would move the kernel sscanf there as well, along with most of the kernel printf. strtoul went with sscanf because that's what it came in with. sscanf went in sys/kern because that's where printf was. It's probably a bad trend. -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message