From owner-freebsd-ipfw Wed Oct 2 6:47:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A725837B401 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iguana.icir.org (iguana.icir.org [192.150.187.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F7343E6E for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:47:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@iguana.icir.org) Received: from iguana.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iguana.icir.org (8.12.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g92DlpIb022632; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:47:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@iguana.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.icir.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g92DloQj022631; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:47:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:47:50 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Danny.Carroll@mail.ing.nl Cc: dcs@tcoip.com.br, ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw2 vs. ipfw1 and 4.7 Message-ID: <20021002064750.G22163@iguana.icir.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Danny.Carroll@mail.ing.nl on Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 03:38:20PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG in defense of daniel, this particular problem has a know fix (attached to his message) and it "just" requires some amount of committer time (more than what i have spent in replying to this thread) to put it into stable, verify that it works as desired, get re@ approval and do the commmit. Daniel is not a committer so the most he can do is remind me of the pending MFC, which i appreciate. Now, the tone might have been slightly different, but i am just looking at the good intentions behind it. cheers luigi On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 03:38:20PM +0200, Danny.Carroll@mail.ing.nl wrote: > > From: Daniel C. Sobral [mailto:dcs@tcoip.com.br] > > Sent: 01 October 2002 21:19 > > I find it EXTREMELY inconvenient that 4.7 gets released with a KNOWN > > bug, that was corrected in -current before we were halfway into the 4.7 > > freeze. Even more so when the change does not affect *any* default > > installation, because the feature must be explicitly enabled before this > > code gets even installed. > > inconvenient? How about contributing? > Most contributers are volunteers you know..... > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message