From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 2 08:10:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A05A72 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 08:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: from mail.ultra-secure.de (mail.ultra-secure.de [78.47.114.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475518FC0C for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 08:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72684 invoked by uid 89); 2 Nov 2012 08:10:22 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 72679, pid: 72681, t: 0.1350s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.97.3/m:54/d:15530 Received: from unknown (HELO suse3) (rainer@ultra-secure.de@212.71.117.1) by mail.ultra-secure.de with ESMTPA; 2 Nov 2012 08:10:22 -0000 Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 09:10:21 +0100 From: Rainer Duffner To: Brett Glass Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? Message-ID: <20121102091021.23cf9af0@suse3> In-Reply-To: <201211020214.UAA29489@lariat.net> References: <201211020214.UAA29489@lariat.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 08:10:33 -0000 Am Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:14:51 -0600 (MDT) schrieb Brett Glass : > I need to build up a few servers and routers, and am wondering how > FreeBSD 9.1 is shaping up. Will it be likely to be more stable and > robust than 9.0-RELEASE? Are there issues that will have to wait > until 9.2-RELEASE to be fixed? Opinions welcome. If I'm not mistaken, the bge-stuff that makes the default NICs ins HP G8 servers (360+380) actually run will not make it back into 9.1. Intel cards work much better anyway...