From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Sep 10 12:56:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0345A14DC2 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 12:56:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA24537; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 13:56:09 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19990910135321.0479f680@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 13:56:04 -0600 To: "David Schwartz" , From: Brett Glass Subject: RE: Market share and platform support In-Reply-To: <003101befbbf$e22bd000$021d85d1@youwant.to> References: <4.2.0.58.19990909220642.04737670@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 12:08 PM 9/10/99 -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > Oh sure, all they'd have to do is deny having knowingly released it under >the BSD license. That's the scary part. Look at the license on code created by Jordan, etc. carefully; it bears the name of the employee, not Walnut Creek's name. Since Walnut Creek owns work done by its employees on company time, a license which says that the work is copyrighted by the employee and then released under the BSD license isn't valid. It has to say that WALNUT CREEK owns the code and is licensing it. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message