From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 18 11:37: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E8514F8A for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 11:36:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA10531; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 11:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Nate Williams Cc: Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite In-Reply-To: <199908181813.MAA03840@mt.sri.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The discussions between Kirk and matt over a glass of beer/drink at kirk's party at USENIX and at the Bay area User's group. On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Nate Williams wrote: > > > Matt doesn't represent the FreeBSD project, and even if he rewrites > > > the VFS subsystem so he can understand it, his rewrite would face > > > considerable resistance on its way into FreeBSD. I don't think > > > there is reason to rewrite it, but there certainly are areas > > > that need fixing. > > > > You are misinformed as far as I know.. From discussions I saw, th > > main architect of a VFS rewrite would be Kirk, and Matt would be acting as > > Kirk's right-hand-man. > > Which discussions are these? Are they archived somewhere? > > > Nate > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message