From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Oct  8 14:13:15 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA26406
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu (root@sunrise.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.121])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA26389
          for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 14:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu (8.7.5/8.6.12) id OAA14753; Tue, 8 Oct 1996 14:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 14:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199610082108.OAA14753@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com
CC: imp@village.org, ports@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <6513.844123238@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: I'll be away for a while
From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * We've talked about this before, and the concensus seemed to be: "Sure,
 * just so long as it doesn't make our stuff a lot harder to read or
 * debug and the changes are reasonable ones, e.g. no gross hacks for
 * working around problems which should be fixed elsewhere."

I agree with that.

Satoshi