From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Fri Feb 14 15:32:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9B1238A8E for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:32:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48Jy6Y4lxlz3GB3 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:32:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciphone2@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id b17so11076793wmb.0 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:32:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=bqzHbCN2cGsrKA3m79wjj2efcdCAa0FI1C5nODXmN00=; b=GjdfJj38zgmwbB/lls2czQBlrzJK+4ZEm4chOLQGQ2e5BrJOx5iAKEZp51SOZX8zQd w2MQMaIn/YglvlJY5ho9CMLd/z5UQ0DHeT+jYgQwIMgCs20yZD2/vGkFuuZBDGnJ08GX erbPRfj8Od6C3FEdFdPIegYU3aNBhiae4nt4/E+5H0kQtFRkV7zjqp+RZrBV9s8p2um3 1Nd2xIxmagA5zRfyD01Ol2NmMoLp6TPqY4nx5BLwUCVzf5QmJ7aCNKp1LjauZEIqMUDh 63C/NxAuOk63yfhtpi5aMmqQUyJPYvAfc/X2+yRL3PXTMqqYScgnEiHgp/WH6OuXYYIp DCTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUXA+H2Gy9jFnKLaivaH/MRpUBuuDVt+4mANGG+ySlSOopcJyV1 EFu0AL2gYSDQxxRw4Ey4qlc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwNBg71VYu6b9GD/iDtFQXUFpP/KLHDdklaLV1wxleLZx5rlmPfRbe/YUVufzJXs32FrmFhcw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9d08:: with SMTP id g8mr4987799wme.141.1581694323854; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:32:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.167] (x59cc9a6c.dyn.telefonica.de. [89.204.154.108]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a6sm7585747wrm.69.2020.02.14.07.32.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:32:03 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Klaus_K=C3=BCchemann?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) Subject: Re: u-boot-rpi* has the existing "make first page reserved" code (shown); this appears to be where any fix would go (it works without FreeBSD changes) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:32:01 +0100 References: <7E7605DC-021D-448A-8459-8EC26BA9836D.ref@yahoo.com> <7E7605DC-021D-448A-8459-8EC26BA9836D@yahoo.com> <36CF6E4B-5607-4752-B2DF-C265BCFB95BA@yahoo.com> <1BE59567-E669-4A88-8389-2E321B0AC1AE@yahoo.com> <27BE7BAF-FD2C-41C6-B270-4BAF77D1FB0C@yahoo.com> <7465BC0D-3F4C-4CD9-B614-0DF321C94331@yahoo.com> <876C4DBE-A243-425A-9978-209C24387668@yahoo.com> <32D0E068-2E1E-46AA-A907-7974BF4DC46D@yahoo.com> <2DC3F5F2-11EB-44A4-BC45-F5A1E92B509B@googlemail.com> <3333F8A8-591F-4722-9E63-904414974142@yahoo.com> To: Mark Millard , Emmanuel Vadot , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3333F8A8-591F-4722-9E63-904414974142@yahoo.com> Message-Id: <7B94C1A8-8523-4993-9074-222358FD5C97@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48Jy6Y4lxlz3GB3 X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.50 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[googlemail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[googlemail.com,quarantine]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yahoo.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[108.154.204.89.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[googlemail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[googlemail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[6.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.39), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.42), asn: 15169(-1.68), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 15:32:06 -0000 > Am 14.02.2020 um 12:20 schrieb Mark Millard : >=20 >=20 >=20 > For the root cause identification, you are welcome. >=20 > (I've not proposed a solution for FreeBSD to adopt.) >=20 But THE SKULL( ..just kidding,,) has( proposed a solution for FreeBSD) = :-) =E2=80=A6 =E2=80=A6. : > Am 14.02.2020 um 11:10 schrieb Emmanuel Vadot : >=20 > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:54:40 +0100 >=20 > I have hold off the upgrade to 2020.01 as rockchip u-boot needs a > newer ATF and they didn't made a new release yet. My plan is to wait > until 2020.04 is release and if at that time there is still no new ATF > release just update the ports to use the latest git version. It couldn=E2=80=99t be clearer: NO breakage for Rockchip as long as there is no usptream - RELEASE. The only thing possible Manu could think about is backporting, but of course only from the upstream and NOT from any hacks outside = there. Backporting is much work and perhaps not the way he wants to go, so it = is to be accepted=20 to wait for 2020.04 . > Mark Millard :=E2=80=A6 I also do not see a communication path for = the size to be reported > to u-boot so that it could automatically adjust. The communication-path is to track the u-boot upstream first. If manu wouldn't do that, he would get complaints for shutting down my RockPro64 ;-) Nevertheless, Mark, thanks again investigating to retrack the root cause = of RPI4 breakage. And all that u-boot stuff is absolutely no reason to stop support the = RPI4(if possible), Just hook up your RPi4-version which boots and continue patching that = messy gadget. But please in the (fbsd-) upstream ... just my two cents=20 Regards Klaus