From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 21 09:01:32 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C39716A4CE
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:01:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from rena.mysmt.net (rena.mysmt.net [82.150.137.102])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A8743D1D
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:01:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from erik@microcontroller.nl)
Received: (qmail 81423 invoked by uid 89); 21 Mar 2005 09:01:27 -0000
Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 81417, pid: 81419, t: 0.9756s
         scanners: clamav: 0.83/m:29/d:709 spam: 3.0.2
Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.0.14)
	(microcon@microcontroller.nl@213.84.50.76)
	by 82-150-137-14.mysmt.net with SMTP; 21 Mar 2005 09:01:26 -0000
From: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" <erik@microcontroller.nl>
To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:01:42 +0100
Message-Id: <1111395702.23249.11.camel@tessa.mysmt.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on rena.mysmt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=3.0.2
Subject: snmp proc
X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Services Providers <freebsd-isp.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isp>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:01:32 -0000

Hi list,

Does anyone have monitoring setup for processes? through the 
proc NAME MIN MAX
section in snmpd.conf ?
When I set it up and use snmpwalk, it doesn't return a reliable response
most of the time. It returns -1 for the number of processes, only
sometimes it returns the valid number and error flags are only then set
according to the min and max values.
I read the man pages, but I can't find what the return value -1 means
either. I hoped for something like "Can't read the processes because...
and thus return -1"


Any tips greatly appreciated!

-Erik.