From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 17 11:39:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90723106566B for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:39:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru) Received: from elf.hq.norma.perm.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:14c0::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E218FC19 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bsdrookie.norma.com. ([IPv6:fd00::7f0]) by elf.hq.norma.perm.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8HBd94J007846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:39:10 +0600 (YEKT) (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru) Message-ID: <50570BDD.1090603@norma.perm.ru> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:39:09 +0600 From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120806 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20120914212716.GB7612@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <20120914212716.GB7612@michelle.cdnetworks.com> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (elf.hq.norma.perm.ru [IPv6:fd00::30a]); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 17:39:10 +0600 (YEKT) X-Spam-Status: No hits=-97.8 bayes=0.5 testhits HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=1.274, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100 autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on elf.hq.norma.perm.ru Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Call for bge(4) testers X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:39:17 -0000 Hi. On 15.09.2012 03:27, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > I'm especially interested in whether there is any ASF/IPMI > regression on BCM570x/571x. > There's a reopened bug concerning 8.x releases version of the bge(4) driver not working with IPMI ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/122252 ). I can also say that enabling ASF on RELENG_8 still leads to locking and hangups. Does this CFT mean that this situation may be improved with the new bge(4) version, on 9.x ? Eugene.