Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 16:57:39 +0200 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> Cc: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions Message-ID: <CAJ-FndABRZMz_H7aCP0Ci4rur7JqSSSA9=E1GE%2BXofJG=BERaA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5065B873.4070509@omnilan.de> References: <CAJ-FndCQ0YEo9_6x3g-12XEs8QmtyecwkLBX9z_sptnOUNTHrw@mail.gmail.com> <20120829060158.GA38721@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndAaFv2o05MZZceT8Qr4mhPxuzrnmOZ30c3gy8=pnjjZvw@mail.gmail.com> <20120831052003.GA91340@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndAaxQA8NYCFSN629XXi9zMVNyu2TuHjZLvmn3jhzRJb4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndDdDVuwc=NgDeG7XiWW59-%2BLs5wc2GBqbjLOLDUdUb9SA@mail.gmail.com> <20120905201531.GA54452@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndCHSroZFfVgHAW8SUVZhDSaX9qix=aZnHVC_BN_fW6sgg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndDr5WmeKXCwSCucQ4w3hPHRBuu36YH1xiW_wKXOkKEdZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndCvc%2BphY_g4CeGfzsj017roxs_C5adjuLuszpEPWO2%2B1g@mail.gmail.com> <20120917140055.GA9037@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndAP9Ua6tRcbrfYY1%2B56O-YbJvmyaUco9K42-0hmchKD6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndAisKoCwLkvXpmW=XhXDRH8me8fMjwrfBuWVqfoA95rmQ@mail.gmail.com> <5061F6E9.6030104@omnilan.de> <5062E0DE.70805@omnilan.de> <CAJ-FndDhKKwydztGCWL71PKdoKkih7aBYCG89KVa2KZEkpBGeg@mail.gmail.com> <5065B873.4070509@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote: > schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime): >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer >> <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote: >>> ... >> After many people willing to test fuse on STABLE_9, I made this patch >> that at least compiles there: >> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_stable9_241030.patch > > Thanks a lot! In the meantime I made the original patch compiling. I > simply looked at the changes which were made around july in the fuse > project to follow changes in head (checkpath(), vrecycle() and > vtruncbuf()) and "reverted" them. > Since I have no idea about the code I modified, I'm happy that you did a > more qualified patch set :-) > >> Of course, I didn't have a chance to test it because I'm also out for >> vacation right now but please do and report. > > Happy holiday!!! If you're by chance arround the Oktoberfest, drop me a > note, I'll pay you a Ma=C3=9F (or any other drink if you don't like > =E2=80=9EWiesnbier=E2=80=9C) :-) I really hoped to make this year, but no luck :/ >>> ... >>> Some questions: Is this planned to be mfc'd and if so, how can one know= ? >> In which sense "how can one know?". We usually specify MFC timeouts in >> the commit message (not sure if this answers your concerns). > > Yep, that's what I wanted to know. So if there's no MFC timeout in the > log, it's not intended to be MFCd ever I guess. > > Thanks a lot! > World/Kernel compiled fine in the meantime, I'll do some sshfs tests. Did you do any test in the end? Thanks, Attilio --=20 Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-FndABRZMz_H7aCP0Ci4rur7JqSSSA9=E1GE%2BXofJG=BERaA>