From owner-cvs-ports  Wed Feb 26 01:26:59 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA27418
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 01:26:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA27413;
          Wed, 26 Feb 1997 01:26:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
          by dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id DAA28938; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 03:26:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ala-ca9-17.ix.netcom.com(207.93.143.81) by dfw-ix1.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3)
	id sma028898; Wed Feb 26 03:26:21 1997
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.9) id BAA00869; Wed, 26 Feb 1997 01:26:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 01:26:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199702260926.BAA00869@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr
CC: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <9702260208.AA27039@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> (message from Jean-Marc Zucconi on Wed, 26 Feb 97 03:08:11 +0100)
Subject: Re: cvs commit:  ports/print/latex/scripts configure ports/print/latex Makefile
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * No this is my fault :-(. I should always install/test my ports in
 * empty directories....

You don't have to go that far, just pkg_delete the old one first.  As
long as the old PLIST is correct (and if pkg_delete spits out errors,
you should fix that anyway :), that would blow away everything.

 * I don't know if many people use the tex/latex port. Of course, if
 * nobody use it, we can remove it. On the other hand there is a big
 * difference in size (because tetex has a lot of stuff).

Yeah.  I'm not about to suggest removing tex/latex now (for starters,
teTeX doesn't build right now), but I keep getting questions about
"which tex port should I use?"  Well now that mltex and latex209 are
gone, I think it's down to a manageable size. :)

Satoshi