From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 20 05:37:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E047B15903 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 05:37:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012D01E92 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 05:37:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-226-44.knology.net [216.186.226.44] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u3K5b7gv029595 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:37:08 -0500 Subject: Re: Ports upgrade .... To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <571684CD.2070800@hiwaay.net> <5716A547.6030504@FreeBSD.org> From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <1c3c340b-f110-ceb4-55f2-d2f05062ce37@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:42:37 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5716A547.6030504@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 05:37:10 -0000 On 04/19/16 16:44, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 19/04/2016 20:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> It brought down almost 14K updates for 3-ish weeks .... I know the ports >> effort is a feverish hive of productivity, but that sounded a bit high >> :-) .... Is that number anomalous, maybe coincident w/ new quarter, >> something else ? More question than problem, but curious. TIA & have a >> good one. > Yes. There was a change to the format of DEPENDS lines which has > affected every ports Makefile. However, this does not mean that you'll > need to recompile every port you have installed -- it doesn't affect the > output from compiling the port in any way. > > It's coincident with the change of quarter, because modifying all the > DEPENDS settings in the middle of a quarter would have made it > impossible subsequently to MFH anything to the quarterly branch. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > *Boooyah* !!! I pretty much figured as much, just curious .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.