From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 13 11:57:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from forty-two.egroups.net (teapot.findmail.com [206.16.70.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6184A1506C for ; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 11:57:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gsutter@forty-two.egroups.net) Received: (from gsutter@localhost) by forty-two.egroups.net (8.9.3/8.9.2) id LAA14151 for freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 11:57:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gsutter) Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 11:57:36 -0700 From: Gregory Sutter To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Max simultaneous NFS mounts? Message-ID: <19990813115736.A62723@forty-two.egroups.net> References: <19990812231623.Y62723@forty-two.egroups.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <19990812231623.Y62723@forty-two.egroups.net>; from Gregory Sutter on Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 11:16:23PM -0700 Organization: Zer0 Approved: graham.spanier Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 11:16:23PM -0700, Gregory Sutter wrote: > What is the (default) maximum number of simultanous NFS mounts in > FreeBSD 2.2.8 and 3.2? > > I was looking at 3.2 and it appears that 63 is the max, and this is > tunable with kernel config option NFS_MUIDHASHSIZ. Is this correct? > What is the maximum possible setting? Bleah. Strike that. NFS mounts don't seem to be any different from normal mounts, so they just get inserted into mountlist, which is a CIRCLEQ. This means that the only limitation is the amount of available kernel memory, correct? Greg -- Gregory S. Sutter Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage. mailto:gsutter@pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~gsutter/ PGP DSS public key 0x40AE3052 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message