From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 26 15:19:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA27469 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 15:16:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA27288 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 15:14:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA21362; Sun, 26 Apr 1998 15:14:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: spork cc: Studded , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: threads performance In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Apr 1998 16:23:50 EDT." Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 15:14:14 -0700 Message-ID: <21358.893628854@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Any recommendations on what to do to get the best performance here? I'd > give up a CPU if I could get more stability and an easier target for Monty > to troubleshoot on. Anyone else here use mysql? Any opinions? Should I > try again with MIT-pthreads? It might give us a good data point. Hmmm... I wonder if John Birrell would be willing to hack performance issues in libc_r for money? :-) Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message