From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 3 08:32:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5962716A4CE; Mon, 3 May 2004 08:32:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-49-130.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.49.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F136243D41; Mon, 3 May 2004 08:32:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BKfQk-0004Yj-GO; Mon, 03 May 2004 17:32:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4096660D.5090602@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 17:32:29 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Kennedy References: <200405031338.i43DceZX018352@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040503151100.GA16961@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> In-Reply-To: <20040503151100.GA16961@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/net/openldap20-* and sendmail X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 15:32:34 -0000 John Kennedy wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 06:38:40AM -0700, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >> Removed files: >> net/openldap20-client Makefile >> net/openldap20-server Makefile ... >> Log: >> removed EOL version of OpenLDAP > > I haven't finished tracking it down because of priorities, but I've had > some problems on 5.2.1 with sendmail and later OpenLDAP client software > (> 2.0). When linked against sendmail (LDAP-enabled, so obviously not > stock), it won't pass some of the tests. > > I'm going on notes, so bear with me a bit. > > On 3/30 (a bit ago), it looked to me like there may have been a library > incompatibility and just linking sendmail against openldap was causing it > to fail its self tests (during the build). Sendmail was playing some games > with timers (their own copy of "sleep", for example) and my thought was > that there was some incompatible itimer stuff going on between the two in > later versions of the LDAP libraries. > > I just never got a chance to chase it down all the way and propose > patches. Do you know if this affects other operating systems as well?