From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr 18 09:33:56 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECCD37B40B
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.westbend.net (ns1.westbend.net [216.47.253.3])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516BE43F85
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:33:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from hetzels@westbend.net)
Received: from Admin02 (admin02.westbend.net [216.47.253.19])
	by mail.westbend.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h3IGXoJJ004528;
	Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:33:51 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from hetzels@westbend.net)
Message-ID: <00dd01c305c8$4bbf1d40$13fd2fd8@Admin02>
From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net>
To: "Andrew" <andrew@ugh.net.au>, <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
References: <20030418222726.X89228-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:33:51 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
Subject: Re: Multiple distfiles
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 16:33:56 -0000

From: "Andrew" <andrew@ugh.net.au>
> I was wondering what the "proper" way was to deal with a port that has 2
> distfiles (that extract to different directories). I tried setting
> NO_WRKSUBDIR and then pade sure the paths in the patches included the
> directory name but when it comes to running make we are in the wrong
> directory (need to descend one more level).
>
> Should i jsut split it into 2 ports and make one depend on the other?
>
It depends on the application your trying to port.

Are the 2 distfiles separate applications with one depending on the other?
If they are then 2 ports would be best, as some one may only want to install
the non-dependent port.

If they are not separate applications then you'll want to set PATCH_WRKSRC
to WRKDIR.

Scot