From owner-freebsd-net Wed Nov 29 4: 1:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (ns1.via-net-works.net.ar [200.10.100.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135E637B69C for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 04:01:49 -0800 (PST) Received: (from fpscha@localhost) by ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA10068; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:04:49 -0300 (ART) From: Fernando Schapachnik Message-Id: <200011291204.JAA10068@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar> Subject: Re: Bridging on wi interfaces In-Reply-To: <3A24B432.CCDBE8C4@iastate.edu> "from Chris at Nov 29, 2000 07:45:54 am" To: Chris Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 09:04:49 -0300 (ART) Cc: Fernando Schapachnik , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Reply-To: Fernando Schapachnik X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org En un mensaje anterior, Chris escribió: > Fernando Schapachnik wrote: > > > > Hello: > > Does anybody know is bridging works on wi (WaveLan) > > interfaces? > > You cannot do bridging on WaveLan interfaces, but there is a > way that you can work around it that we are now using to good > effect. I guess the question is--what do you need to do > with it? If all the boxes that you want to do bridging between > are FreeBSD, then you might try this out. What I need to do is: | router |-eth-| FBSD w/wi |-wireless link-| FBSD w/wi |-eth-|router| I need the routers to be "directly connected". Is this possible? Thanks and regards! Fernando P. Schapachnik Administración de la red VIA NET.WORKS ARGENTINA S.A. fschapachnik@vianetworks.com.ar Conmutador: (54-11) 4323-3333 - Soporte: 0810-333-AYUDA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message