From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep  9 01:10:42 2013
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0984BD4D;
 Mon,  9 Sep 2013 01:10:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1AF2B0B;
 Mon,  9 Sep 2013 01:10:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
 id 4118456088; Sun,  8 Sep 2013 20:10:35 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 20:10:35 -0500
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r326675 - head/irc/bitchx
Message-ID: <20130909011035.GA3361@lonesome.com>
References: <201309071818.r87IIHvB079661@svn.freebsd.org>
 <522B8DA8.1010208@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <522B8DA8.1010208@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 01:10:42 -0000

On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 03:33:44PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> I was thinking of adding 2 names into MAINTAINER on a port and seeing
> what fallout ensues.

Traditionally I had shied away from it due to not knowing how the
following would react: portbuild; portsmon; freshports.

But I'm not prepared to fight that battle anymore.

mcl