From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 14:22:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAEA16A401 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piso@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from mail.oltrelinux.com (krisma.oltrelinux.com [194.242.226.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5CC13C44C for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piso@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from newluxor.wired.org (ip-115-132.sn1.eutelia.it [62.94.115.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.oltrelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD4D11AE98; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:22:44 +0100 (CET) Received: (from piso@localhost) by newluxor.wired.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l2EDvCVJ002795; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:57:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from piso) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:56:57 +0100 From: Paolo Pisati To: Robert Huff Message-ID: <20070314135657.GB2711@tin.it> References: <17911.62465.534926.306376@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17911.62465.534926.306376@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at krisma.oltrelinux.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: network card not probed X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:22:51 -0000 On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:09:21AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote: [snip] > and loading if_de.ko by hand produced the following: > > de0: port 0xa000 > -0xa07f mem 0xef800000-0xef80007f irq 14 at device 11.0 on pci0 > de0: ZNYX ZX34X 21140 [10-100Mb/s] pass 1.1 > de0: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface > de0: Ethernet address: 00:c0:95:f8:17:af > de0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > de0: [ITHREAD] > > The machine is running (I added the necessary line to > loader.conf), but I'd like to eliminate user error before filing a > PR. if the kernel didn't complain about duplicate symbols, it means you didn't have if_de compiled in your kernel. > So: tracked down the "if_watchdog", no problem, but can't find > anything on the "[ITHREAD]" /per se/. it's just a message saying "the handler for this NIC runs in the ithread context", part of the interrupt filtering commit. > And what has changed to make the card invisible? i guess something about module loading... bye, P.