From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 16 15:24:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8EF37B54B; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:24:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA89429; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 15:24:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: "Chad R. Larson" Cc: noor@comrax.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Latest RELENG_4. In-Reply-To: <200007161934.MAA13058@freeway.dcfinc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Chad R. Larson wrote: > As I recall, noor@comrax.com wrote: > > What is the latest FreeBSD-STABLE release, and is it stable enough for > > a productional system? > > Please remember that "STABLE" refers to the stability of the source > tree, not of the resulting running system. That is, you should not see > developmental work going on in -STABLE. Well, I claim this to be false: the targetted stability *is* of the resulting product. Of course, we sometimes make mistakes - but if you have *any* stability problems you should tell us!! Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message