From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 20:29:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C85106566B; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry.herbelot@free.fr) Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDDB8FC1C; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.herbelot.nom (unknown [82.227.159.103]) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7F782260; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:28:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from tulipe.herbelot.nom (tulipe.herbelot.nom [192.168.2.5]) by mail.herbelot.nom (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oAIKSoc2026327; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:28:51 +0100 (CET) From: Thierry Herbelot To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:28:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-STABLE; KDE/4.5.3; amd64; ; ) References: <201011170627.28025.thierry.herbelot@free.fr> <201011171936.10764.thierry.herbelot@free.fr> <20101118081512.K24596@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20101118081512.K24596@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201011182128.44827.thierry.herbelot@free.fr> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD virtualization mailing list Subject: Re: VIMAGE: Freed UMA keg was not empty X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:29:08 -0000 "Bjoern A. Zeeb" a =E9crit > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote: > > As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment) > >=20 > > This is a serial console log showing the command loop that triggers the > > bug on a debug kernel and ensuing DDB session. > >=20 > > the obvious problem line is : > > routetbl 2684 303890K 3469 > >=20 > > (further tests showed an increase of the routetbl malloc zone by 4MBytes > > for each vnet jail creation/destruction cycle) >=20 > Hmm, I had fixed that (somewhere). I'll see where the patch went. You > are on 8.1-RELEASE or -STABLE? This will be for a -release, thus 8.1 for now, but we will switch to 8.2 AS= AP Thanks TfH >=20 > /bz