From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jul 5 5:11:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E8737B400 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 05:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from south.nanolink.com (south.nanolink.com [217.75.134.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 936E543E3B for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 05:11:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: (qmail 79017 invoked by uid 85); 5 Jul 2002 12:23:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO straylight.ringlet.net) (213.226.16.26) by south.nanolink.com with SMTP; 5 Jul 2002 12:23:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 1780 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Jul 2002 12:11:25 -0000 Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 15:11:25 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Thomas Quinot Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Mike Tancsa , Ruslan Ermilov , security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Default ssh protocol in -STABLE [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD-STABLE now has OpenSSH 3.4p1] Message-ID: <20020705121125.GF494@straylight.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Quinot , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Mike Tancsa , Ruslan Ermilov , security@freebsd.org References: <20020705073634.GA64656@sunbay.com> <20020705073634.GA64656@sunbay.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020705073043.01c52198@192.168.0.12> <20020705134934.A40046@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020705134934.A40046@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by Nik's Monitoring Daemon (AMaViS perl-11d ) Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 01:49:34PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote: > Le 2002-07-05, Dag-Erling Smorgrav ?crivait : >=20 > > What do people think about this? Keep 2,1 or revert to 1,2? >=20 > Since the version change is going to suprise people anyway, I'd say let > us do it all the way and switch to protocol 2,1. It is more than time > to phase out protocol 1. Seconded. G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 What would this sentence be like if it weren't self-referential? --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9JYzt7Ri2jRYZRVMRAjM5AKDAK+b2j/F92l93TOPi9wZLyJk7jQCdE9MD mA0l9ddod1gkAPH5KH/V4nU= =VfvN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message